No, That's Wrong, and Here's Why

This is a game about arguments. Some may call it by the fancy name debate, but it is really, when you come down to it, arguing.
Here's how it is:
Someone will state a point. Say, "Strongbad is morally superior to Homestar."
Someone will say "No, that's wrong, and here's why," or something akin to that.
Second someone will say why that is. "Strongbad killed the Kennedeys."
Next person will say the "no that's wrong" opener and give an argument to undo the last post's argument.
Whatever it is, it can't be directly contradicting of the last point. "Strongbad didn't kill the Kennedeys"
It has to be some new information.
This will continue until someone introduces a new topic. You can tell if they introduce a new topic if they don't say "No, that's wrong, and here's why,"
You can use my topic, or just introduce an entirely random one.
Topics don't have to be HR related. But they CAN be! They can be ANYTHING related or NOTHING related.
Other than those rules, there are no rules!
Bhtup out.

Bhtup wrote:Bhtup out.

Nah, you can't be out. There aren't enough Twinkies.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
You can never have too few twinkies.

Bhtup wrote:No, that's wrong, and here's why:
You can never have too few twinkies.

Is twinkys never having enough of the topic? I'll just say it is.
But you see, that was just you saying your opinion, many other people love twinkys and could believe that there is never enough twinkys. I say that this topic for an argument is un winnable. You can't come to a conclusion... I say that the new topic is:
If some on is to burn their tong while drinking hot coco than they should be able to get a refund from the company that made the hot coco.

Sgt. Beadsmaster wrote:

Bhtup wrote:No, that's wrong, and here's why:
You can never have too few twinkies.

Is twinkys never having enough of the topic? I'll just say it is.
But you see, that was just you saying your opinion, many other people love twinkys and could believe that there is never enough twinkys. I say that this topic for an argument is un winnable.

That's what he was saying.
He was saying that, no matter how few twinkies there were, he would still eat them.

mediaStoragedisk wrote:

Sgt. Beadsmaster wrote:

Bhtup wrote:No, that's wrong, and here's why:
You can never have too few twinkies.

Is twinkys never having enough of the topic? I'll just say it is.
But you see, that was just you saying your opinion, many other people love twinkys and could believe that there is never enough twinkys. I say that this topic for an argument is un winnable.

That's what he was saying.
He was saying that, no matter how few twinkies there were, he would still eat them.

Well, if he ate enough twinkies, he would grow fat. And if he ate even more, he would have liver failure. If that wouldn't finish him off, the following heart attack might kill him.

ARHGHG! Post these Degeneracies in the random thoughts! I never imagined my game would get so congested!

If some on is to burn their tong while drinking hot coco than they should be able to get a refund from the company that made the hot coco.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Hot cocoa companies are founded by Buddha and have no money to refund.

Bhtup wrote:

If some on is to burn their tong while drinking hot coco than they should be able to get a refund from the company that made the hot coco.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Hot cocoa companies are founded by Buddha and have no money to refund.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Buddha founded coffee, he likes it rather more than cocoa. He left cocoa to Shiva.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Buddha founded coffee, he likes it rather more than cocoa. He left cocoa to Shiva.

NTRHW:
Buddha never needs to get up in the morning, he's always meditating. And Shiva is too busy creating and destroying to found anything.

Bhtup wrote:

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Buddha founded coffee, he likes it rather more than cocoa. He left cocoa to Shiva.

NTRHW:
Buddha never needs to get up in the morning, he's always meditating. And Shiva is too busy creating and destroying to found anything.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Buddha has an army of disciples who wake him up every day, begging for wisdom.

No, that's wrong, because Buddha is too busy playing World of Warcraft to deal with his disc-i-pals.

DELETED! wrote:No, that's wrong, because Buddha is too busy playing World of Warcraft to deal with his disc-i-pals.

No, that's wrong because World of Warcraft sucks.

No, that's wrong, because teh lulzy YouTube video of Leroy Jenkins was formed from World of Warcraft.

No, that's wrong, and here's why:
Leroy Jenkins has a permanent contract with the Brothers Chaps, which stops him for working for anybody else (he's going to be the voice of Foxface in Season 2 of SBCG4AP.)